Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Is the worst yet to come?

The financial market is in a mess. The 158 year old investment bank, Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. The US government bailed out Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, America's mortgage giants. Bank of America, the largest commercial bank in the US, swallowed Merrill Lynch. Bear Stearns was swallowed by JP Morgan Chase, with the help of the Fed. The Fed is about to swallow AIG.

As Bush  tried to explain the crisis in July, "Wall Street got drunk... It got drunk and now it's got a hangover." Two months later, it seems Wall Street is not just sobering up, it is detoxifying. It got high while authorities are watching investors take drugs.

When I was researching about the US mortgage market a year ago, I was surprised and baffled by their system. When interest rates are falling, borrowers can refinance their loan, i.e. adjust the conditions of the loan to bring down the interest rate. In most cases, refinancing also include increasing the loan amount to reflect the increase in property value.

Most loans are fixed for 20 or more years. So when interest rates are rising, borrowers would simply hold to the loans. Borrowers can also choose from a wide array of mortgage options. In one mortgage option, borrowers don't have to pay anything for the first five years.

The system is almost risk free for borrowers.  It seems too good to be true... and it was too good to be true. After a mortgage lender has released the loan, mortgages are bundled together and sold as mortgage-backed securities (MBS). A big chunk of these securities were bought by Freddie mac and Fannie Mae. The rest are bought by commercial banks, investments banks, mutual fund companies, trust funds and different financial institutions. 

When property values started falling, the value of MBS fall. When borrowers started defaulting on their mortgages, these MBS became worthless. And this is why all these financial institutions are in trouble. Well, there are other reasons why they are in trouble including higher interest rates,  higher inflation and weaker economy but the sub-prime mortgage crisis is the main root of the current financial crisis.

One problem in Wall Street is that there was a lack of transparency, something heard more referring to governments. Financial institutions refuse to divulge how much they invested in these troubled assets. For an investment bank to disclose how much it invested in a particular sector is like telling other companies their investment strategy.

The financial market is not as efficient as economists hope it should be, it is prone to the influence of animal spirits, self-fulfilling prophecies and voodoo dolls and feng-shui. If everybody expects markets to crash and pull out their investments and then the market will surely crash. These financial institutions think that if they keep their losses until the worst is over then they might survive the crisis.

And now here are the problems. Monetary and fiscal authorities failed to exercise their supervisory and regulatory power. The US government bailed the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae this year that should have been done last year. The Fed helped JP Morgan buy Bear Stearns, by lending it money. If Bear Stearns was allowed to fall, Lehman would not have hoped that the Fed would also help them.

The problem is called in economics as moral hazard problem. As authorities give explicit or implicit guarantees to institutions that are "too big to fall" they become reckless. In a market-based economy characterized by competition, there are always winners and losers. There are No too-big-to-fall winners and no too-big-to-fall losers.

Inefficient and under-capitalized banks and financial institutions must be allowed to collapse before the market can get better. More banks should be allowed to fall. More financial institutions should be allowed to collapse. They took high risks and their investments failed. And no matter what happens, it is small investors like me who will pay eventually. 

6 comments:

  1. Will the U.S. financial turmoil have profound effects in RP's economy, despite having strong economic fundamentals (as asserted by teh finance secretary)?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well... there are several segments of the gross domestic product that will surely be affected, exports will likely weaken due to lower demand from our main trading partners, primarily US and Japan (39% of our exports go to China, they are mainly components for electronic products to be exported primarily to the US). Remittances from Overseas Filipinos, which have substantial impact on consumer demand, will likely go down. Foreign investments will surely drop.

    I am not sure about the "strong economic fundamentals" mentioned by our finance secretary. If they are the same economic fundamentals mentioned by McCain... we are doomed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Prinz, question.

    Would you know if Philippine banks bundle up their mortgages and sell it as securities - similar to what they did in the US? Brian, my officemate, was asking me about this. I told him na I don't think so because I don't think our banks are sophisticated enough for such instruments, and definitely the mortgage system here cannot back it up. But I wouldn't know for sure, we're asking around now, would you happen to know?

    Plus, a comment lang on your comment on Bek's question from your last post. I am also likely to think that remittances will go down because a huge portion of it comes from the US, which is going on a downturn. However, the last time I checked on remittances, there's still robust inflows into the country and it seems like it doesn't show any signs of slowing down anytime now (or at least it seems). So ano yun, may lag effect lang, we'll feel the remittance slowdown maybe 6 months from now?

    Would really appreciate your answers =)

    ReplyDelete
  4. hi blessie
    1. not yet. PAGIBIG Fund (Home Mutual Fund) released securities supposedly backed by mortgages but they were actually supported by sovereign guarantee not the loans issued by PAGIBIG. The National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation, the counterpart of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is planning to issue MBS in Nov. Read more from this excellent article from ABS-CBN News/ Newsbreak http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/09/12/08/rp-wont-follow-us-subprime-mess

    ReplyDelete
  5. On remittances: The cumulative amount of remittances in July 2008 rose by 18.17% from a year earlier, which is higher than the 16.04% y-o-y rise in July 2007. However, from Feb to May 2007 remittances rose by more than 20% y-o-y, significantly higher than the barely 15% y-o-y increases from Feb to May 2008. Those are clear indicators of a slowdown in remittances. BSP figures here:
    http://www.bsp.gov.ph/publications/tables/2008_09/news-09152008a1.htm

    ReplyDelete
  6. thanks prinz for the links especially on the NHMFC. as for the remittances, oo nga.

    thanks sa insights prinz =)

    ReplyDelete